‘Unprecedented’ numbers of Pa. women from both parties looking to run for office

Posted in In the News, Women in PA on February 13th, 2017 by admin – Be the first to comment

At 5:30 in the morning of November 9, 2016, Natasha Taylor-Smith crept into her 13-year-old daughter’s bedroom.

She picked up her daughter’s smartphone, typed “CNN.com” into the browser and saw a large picture of now-President Donald Trump.

Taylor-Smith put down the phone and woke her daughter up.

“As soon as she opened her eyes, she says, ‘Did Hillary win?’ and I said, ‘No,’” Taylor-Smith recalled.

Her daughter gave her a confused look.

“‘Donald Trump’s going to be our president?” she asked.

“Yes,” Taylor-Smith replied.

Then, her daughter, who had been expecting to hear that overnight, the country had elected its first woman president, simply said, “Hmm,” and walked out of the room.

It wasn’t the first political setback for Taylor-Smith, an attorney who’d spent the fall making phone calls and knocking on doors for the Clinton campaign in suburban Montgomery County.

In 2015, she ran to be a judge on the Court of Common Pleas and lost.

But she says she has not felt a temptation to disengage from the political process. In fact, ever since then, Taylor-Smith says she’s been ready to dive back in.

“I feel like sometimes like a fire is welling up inside me and if I don’t have a constructive outlet for it, I might go crazy,” she said.

‘This is completely unprecedented’

For Taylor-Smith, that constructive outlet is doing whatever she can to support progressive causes and candidates, including herself. 

She is one of 25 women who recently spent their weekend sitting around long tables in a plumber’s union hall in Northeast Philadelphia, listening to back-to-back presentations about the ins and outs of running for office.

These women are the second class brought together by Emerge Pennsylvaniathe state chapter of a national organization devoted to helping Democratic women run. It offers an intense, six-month training in every aspect of campaigning from door-knocking to fundraising.

Executive Director Anne Wakabayashi said more than 100 women applied to this year’s program and the timing was notable.

“My email comes to my phone and it was just buzzing constantly the day after Election Day with people signing up for our email list,” she said. “We saw a bunch of likes on our Facebook page, we saw all this interest and so I checked our applications status and I noticed we had a couple applications started and it just kept going up and up and up.”

Truscha Quatrone, Wakabayashi’s counterpart in New Jersey, has also seen a rise in demand.

“Since the women’s march, my inbox is full with women wanting to take training to run for office,” Quatrone said in an e-mail. 

This is not what Dana Brown expected at all.

Brown heads up the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics at Chatham University in Pittsburgh.  She and her colleagues believed Clinton’s loss and the divisive 2016 election cycle would turn women off. 

“Many of us thought that if she lost the presidency then that would have a chilling effect for women, that women would see perhaps how she was treated negatively by the press or by other outlets… and that is just the complete opposite,” she said. 

In fact, Brown has been flooded with inquiries for the university’s bi-partisan “Ready To Run” program coming up next month. Normally, she has to create demand for the training. For the first time, she had to create a waitlist for the day-long session in Pittsburgh.

“This is completely unprecedented for this program,” she said. “The room literally is at capacity. We could be breaking fire codes if we allow any more women in.”

Despite the fact women make up 51 percent of Pennsylvania’s population, they make up just 18.6 percent of the state legislature. In New Jersey, it’s 30 percent.

Studies have shown women face several barriers to running, including fears about asking for money and lack of support from party leadership. Balancing political careers with family obligations are towards the bottom of that list.

Brown says this new trend is being driven by Democrats — many of them members of the pro-Clinton group Pantsuit Nation, which has been sharing opportunities for civic engagement, such as Ready to Run, on social media.

But Brown and her counterparts at the Center For Women and Politics at Rutgers University are also seeing an uptick in the number of Republican women interested in running for office for the first time.

‘Maybe politics isn’t as scary’

On a recent weeknight, Michelle Rupp was among the crowd women at a restaurant in a strip mall in Landsdale, eating Mediterranean food, drinking wine and talking politics.

It was the monthly gathering of the Montgomery County Republican Women’s Leadership group.

Rupp was brought here by a friend who’s recruited her to run for the North Penn school board.

She has come to the meetings for years to advocate for her 11-year-old daughter, who has an uncommon birth defect that causes many challenges for her in school.

But Rupp is feeling rather uneasy about being a first-time candidate.

“Scared to death,” she said with a laugh. “I have absolutely no idea what I’m in for.”

Rupp was an early supporter of President Trump and thinks his surprise victory played a hand, albeit a subconscious one, in her decision to run.

“I really thought about how different he was as a candidate and he’s not that classic politician — he’s a businessman,” said Roop, who runs her own veterinary practice.

“It really got me thinking that maybe politics isn’t as scary or as difficult as what I thought it was… and maybe you really can keep your soul and still run and be an elected official,” she said.

Rupp said having guidance and support from other Republican women who are energized by their party’s big win is making her journey to the ballot easier.

‘Women… are those new faces’

So what will it take to turn this influx of interest into election wins?

The number of women in Congress has been stuck around 19 percent for more than a decade, according to Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers. In statehouses across the country, she said the average is only slightly higher at 24.8 percent. 

“The pace of progress has been glacially slow,” said Walsh.

Walsh thinks that’s because leaders of both the Republican and Democratic parties — many of them men — have not focused enough attention and resources on getting women to run.

But after the so-called “year of the outsider” and the historic women’s marches that took place across the country and across the world last Saturday, Walsh believes they just might.

“If voters are looking for outsiders or new faces…women in fact, in many cases, are those new faces,” she said.

Read more at http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/homepage-feature/item/100711-unpredecented-numbers-of-pa-women-from-both-parties-looking-to-run-for-office

Women encouraged to run for office

Posted in In the News, Women in PA on February 13th, 2017 by admin – Be the first to comment

A little more than a week ago, hundreds of thousands of women marched in Washington and cities across the country. But some public policy advocates want to see more women run.

Specifically, more women need to run for office, advocates say.

Women hold about 19 percent of the seats in Pennsylvania’s General Assembly. The state Legislature includes 47 women among its 253 members.

TODAY’S SPONSOR

Locally, state Sen. Judy Schwank, a Ruscombmanor Township Democrat, stands as the lone woman among the 13 state lawmakers representing portions of Berks County.

Even worse, for the second consecutive session, Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation has no women among its 20 members.

“It’s embarrassing. It really is,” said Dana Brown, executive director of the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics at Chatham University. “Pennsylvania has a lot of great attributes, but the diversity of the governing body is not one of them.”

Pennsylvania trails the country at large when it comes to female legislators. The Keystone State is 39th in the nation, according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University.

Both the state Democratic and Republican parties are doing better at reaching out to women, experts say.

Pennsylvania Democrats nominated former state environmental secretary Katie McGinty in her unsuccessful effort to unseat U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, a Lehigh County Republican. Republicans have made progress in finding female candidates. State Rep. Martina White became the first Republican to win an open state legislative seat in Philadelphia in a quarter-century.

But as the numbers show, there is plenty of progress to be made.

A complex problem

Nationwide, the percentage of female state lawmakers has been stagnant for nearly a decade, said Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers. About 24 percent of all state lawmakers are women.

“Our challenge is not that women are running in droves and don’t win,” Walsh said. “Women win at the same rate as men do in comparable races.”

The challenge has been to get women to run in the first place.

Women typically haven’t been recruited as aggressively as men to run for state legislative seats, Walsh said.

“Women are more likely to run for the state legislature if they are recruited, and we know they are less likely to be recruited than men are,” Walsh said.

Schwank said many women shy away from running for office.

“I think that we still wait to be asked or worry that we may not have the qualifications to do the job as we feel it needs to be done,” Schwank said. “I think that attitude is persistent among women.”

The state Democratic and Republican parties are demonstrating more interest in finding women to run for office, said Brown. But she said both parties have long held a male selection bias when it comes to seeking legislative candidates.

Women often wait later than men before running for office, Walsh and Brown said. Some feel they can’t run until their children are grown.

Schwank said that was true for her.

“I don’t know that I could have been able to do the job the way that I wanted to do it if I was trying to raise children at the same time,” said Schwank.

Schwank, who is 65, has just begun her second full term. But as many women wait until their late 40s to enter politics, they often have a shorter trajectory, Walsh and Brown noted.

It typically takes years for a state lawmaker to get choice committee assignments or leadership posts. Female candidates – and male candidates – have a greater chance of gaining clout in the Capitol if they run for a seat at an earlier age.

Some women shy away from the less appealing aspects of running for office, such as fundraising or the prospect of negative campaign ads.

Female lawmakers typically match male candidates in fundraising in comparable races, Walsh said, but they may have to expend more time and energy to do it.

Nature of the state

Pennsylvania’s full-time legislature, which pays the second-highest legislative salaries in the country, presents another obstacle to getting more women in the Capitol.

Lawmakers earn a minimum of about $86,000, and top legislative leaders can earn more than $100,000.

“Men tend to want those jobs,” Brown said. “It tends to be more competitive.”

States that pay lawmakers modest salaries typically have a greater number of women serving as legislators, said Brown.

Pennsylvania’s legislative seats are increasingly safe, thanks to redistricting efforts designed to protect incumbents in both parties. There are fewer competitive districts for any candidate to pursue.

“Your best opportunity is in a vacant seat,” Schwank said.

The gridlock in politics – at the state and national level – can be a deterrent. Some women interested in public service opt for working with nonprofit groups or philanthropic organizations.

“They find other avenues to affect social change,” Brown said.

Why it matters

For Brown and others, it’s not about merely getting more women into the state Capitol. Advocates argue that getting more women to serve as state lawmakers would strengthen the General Assembly.

Women legislate differently than men, Brown said. They bring up public policy issues that are often ignored.

The federal law providing paid family leave emerged in the 1990s largely because the rising number of women in Congress articulated the need for it.

“We know from political science research when we have more women at the table, we have more public policy interests being brought up,” Brown said.

Female lawmakers are often more interested in sharing the credit on legislation with their colleagues.

“They tend to use a lot more collaborative language, identifying ‘we’ as opposed to ‘I’ in claiming credit for bills,” Brown said. “It may seem like a small thing, but it leads to more bipartisanship.”

When there is more bipartisan cooperation, it makes it easier to pass important legislation, Brown said.

Surge of interest

More women appear motivated to run for office.

In February, Chatham’s Pennsylvania Center for Women in Politics is running two bipartisan training sessions to help prepare women who are considering running for elected office.

An event in Pittsburgh is already sold out with 111 women registered, Brown said, and an additional 85 women are on a waiting list. She said her office is scrambling to find a larger venue.

“We cannot be turning that many women away,” she said.

Chatham is holding another event in Philadelphia on Feb. 18, and slots are still available.

Brown attributes the enthusiasm to the 2016 election. Democratic women are motivated to run because they are angry about the results, Brown said. Conversely, some Republican women say they are enthused about the possibilities of holding elective office in light of the GOP’s recent successes.

Brown said the Republican and Democratic parties are eager to see more women participating. And she said women thinking about running for office shouldn’t be deterred by the small number of female lawmakers in Pennsylvania.

“Be a part of the change,” Brown said.

 

Read more http://www.readingeagle.com/news/article/women-encouraged-to-run-for-office

Data: Women lack representation in elected positions

Posted in In the News, Women in PA on January 26th, 2017 by admin – Be the first to comment

Allegheny County added one woman to the state Legislature this month following November’s election. That brings the total number of women representing Allegheny County in the state’s governing body to one.

But Democrat Anita Astorino Kulik of Kennedy — whose district includes nearby Coraopolis, Emsworth and Neville Island — says she is used to being the only woman in a roomful of men: she spent 12 years on the board of commissioners in Kennedy Township.

“It wasn’t so bad being the only woman, because I felt like ‘I’m going to speak up’ because I had to,” Kulik says.

The number of women in Pennsylvania’s governing body is going in a different direction than the rest of the country, according to the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics at Chatham University.

Executive Director Dana Brown says the conventional wisdom that “when women run, women win” wasn’t borne out on Nov. 8, at least not in the Keystone State.

When the general assembly convened this month, the body saw a net gain of two women, bringing the total to 49, or 19 percent of the total Legislature. This puts the governing body 40th in the country for its representation of women. And even if all of the women who ran had won, Pennsylvania still would be lagging behind: 74 women ran for seats in the legislature, and just over half of them won.

Women are underrepresented on municipal governing bodies as well. In Sewickley Valley municipalities with a population of at least 500, only one has a female mayor — Barbara Carrier of Glen Osborne.

Carrier spent years on Glen Osborne Council before becoming mayor in 2014.

“We need more women in government because women have different ways of thinking,” Carrier said. But women need to know what they’re getting themselves into, she adds.

“As a woman mayor, I’ve had people ask a man about something I was responsible for. You need to be assertive, but in a good way.”

She’s’ retired from her full-time teaching job at Sewickley Academy now, and her three children are grown, so Carrier believes she’ll be able to do more for her community.

“When I first started there were very few women,” she said. “Now there are two other women along with me. Hopefully more women will realize the value of local government.”

But, she adds, anyone considering a run for any political office should consider their motivations, and be realistic about what to expect.

“Government is very slow, and you have to be very patient,” she said. “I would love to see more people become involved who know it’s important to understand the greater good, that not everything is just about how it affects you.”

Aleppo, Bell Acres, Edgeworth, Leet and Sewickley Heights have one woman each on their municipality’s governing body; Glen Osborne, Leetsdale and Sewickley each have two female members. Sewickley Hills has three.

Brown says research shows that like the perspective women bring to the business world, women in politics offer much-needed, different voices to any governing body.

“They bring a different set of life experiences, and lead differently than men,” she said. While female representatives do push for so called “women’s issues” like child care, equal pay, and paid family leave, that’s not all they’re bringing to the table. “They’re more likely to be bipartisan, to change how things are done, and be more transparent, showing how policy gets made.”

So why can’t Pennsylvania elect more women to its Legislature? Brown says there are two big factors that make the Keystone State a tough nut to crack. First, Pennsylvania is a state that favors incumbents, even at the hyperlocal level. Indeed, 86 percent of the incumbent women running in 2016 were reelected.

Second, like other states with full-time governing bodies, Pennsylvania’s Legislature has a hard time attracting female candidates.

But Brown said there’s another statistic about women in Pennsylvania that seems to go against conventional political science research as well: More are signing up to run for office in 2017 than history would have predicted.

“I thought there would be a chilling effect, from all the negative campaign ads” in 2016, Brown said, adding that women cite negative campaigning as one of the top reasons they don’t seek political office.

The PCWP’s Ready to Run session on Feb. 4 at Chatham’s Shadyside campus is at capacity and has a waiting list, and a Philadelphia session is filling up quickly. Ready to Run Pennsylvania is part of the national Ready to Run network of the Center for American Women and Politics based at Rutgers University. The organization offers bipartisan training and resources for women who want to learn more about how to run for public office.

For her part, Kulik, a practicing attorney, says her top priorities in the legislature will be looking at revisions to domestic violence laws to strengthen protection-from-abuse orders, early childhood education and ways to make things easier for working families.

“So many women and families are working so hard just to keep their heads above water,” she said. “This is a chance to try to work on that.”

Read more at TribeLive

It started with a retiree. Now the Women’s March could be the biggest inauguration demonstration.

Posted in In the News, Women in PA on January 5th, 2017 by admin – Be the first to comment

 January 3

Teresa Shook never considered herself much of an activist, or someone particularly versed in feminist theory. But when the results of the presidential election became clear, the retired attorney in Hawaii turned to Facebook and asked: What if women marched on Washington around Inauguration Day en masse?

She asked her online friends how to create an event page, and then started one for the march she was hoping would happen.

By the time she went to bed, 40 women responded that they were in.

When she woke up, that number had exploded to 10,000.

Now, more than 100,000 people have registered their plans to attend the Women’s March on Washington in what is expected to be the largest demonstration linked to Donald Trump’s inauguration and a focal point for activists on the left who have been energized in opposing his agenda.

Planning for the Jan. 21 march got off to a rocky start. Controversy initially flared over the name of the march, and whether it was inclusive enough of minorities, particularly African Americans, who have felt excluded from many mainstream feminist movements.

Organizers say plans are on track, after securing a permit from D.C. police to gather 200,000 people near the Capitol at Independence Avenue and Third Street SW on the morning after Inauguration Day. Exactly how big the march will be has yet to be determined, with organizers scrambling to pull together the rest of the necessary permits and raise the $1 million to $2 million necessary to pull off a march triggered by Shook’s Facebook venting.

The march has become a catch-all for a host of liberal causes, from immigrant rights to police killings of African Americans. But at its heart is the demand for equal rights for women after an election that saw the defeat of Democrat Hillary Clinton, the first female presidential nominee of a major party.

“We plan to make a bold and clear statement to this country on the national and local level that we will not be silent and we will not let anyone roll back the rights we have fought and struggled to get,” said Tamika Mallory, a veteran organizer and gun-control advocate who is one of the march’s main organizers.

More than 150,000 women and men have responded on the march’s Facebook pagethat they plan on attending. At least 1,000 buses are headed to Washington for the march through Rally, a website that organizes buses to protests. Dozens of groups, including Planned Parenthood and the antiwar CodePink, have signed on as partners.

Organizers insist the march is not anti-Trump, even as many of the groups that have latched on to it fiercely oppose his agenda.

“Donald Trump’s election has triggered a lot of women to be more involved than they ordinarily would have been, which is ironic, because a lot of us thought a Hillary presidency would motivate women,” said Dana Brown, executive director of the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics at Chatham University in Pittsburgh. “A lot of women seem to be saying, ‘This is my time. I’m not going to be silent anymore.’ ”

Trump Inaugural Committee spokesman Boris Epshteyn defended the president-elect’s popularity among women in an interview on CNN. While Trump did not receive the majority of women’s votes, he got an “overwhelming” number of them, Epshteyn said.

“We’re here to hear their concerns,” he said. “We welcome them to our side as well.”

That all this could grow out of a dashed-off post from her perch nearly 5,000 miles from Washington is amazing to Shook, who has booked her ticket and plans to be in the capital on Jan. 21.

Read more at The Washington Post

Report Details Officials’ Emails Discovered During Kathleen Kane’s Tenure

Posted in In the News on November 22nd, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

The emails found on government computers were by turns pornographic, racist and homophobic, and their piecemeal release, beginning in 2014, by Kathleen G. Kane, then the attorney general of Pennsylvania, sent two State Supreme Court justices and an assortment of other officials packing amid suspicions of overly cozy relationships between judges and prosecutors in the state.

Ms. Kane, by then embroiled in scandal herself, late last year hired an outside investigator, Douglas F. Gansler, to comb through the whole trove and see what else was there.

And even as Ms. Kane — who in August was convicted on criminal conspiracy and other charges and sentenced to 10 to 23 months in prison after illegally leaking grand jury records — took her own spectacular fall from grace, the investigation lingered as an unwritten coda to her stormy tenure. Would it be a swipe from the political ashes, revealing more offensive conduct by the “old boys’ network” she had come into office swearing to puncture?

The answer came on Tuesday in the form of a 50-page report: Yes, there were more inappropriate emails sent by current and retired state officials — nearly 12,000 in all — including obscene photographs and a racist joke about the first lady, Michelle Obama. Thirteen high-ranking officials, including three more judges, were found to have offensive material, and 38 more people were found to be “high-volume” senders of offensive or explicit content.

“These communications demonstrate a fundamental and dangerous degree of impropriety that threatens public confidence in a fair and unbiased law enforcement and judicial system, and impartial governance more generally,” wrote Mr. Gansler, who did not recommend criminal charges.

Read more at The New York Times

Women disappointed in 2016 election results get ‘Ready to Run’

Posted in In the News on November 20th, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

WASHINGTON — Rabiya Kader never considered making a run for political office. It’s an “ugly business,” she said, and she hates asking people for money.

Then Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton to win the presidency, and Kader’s thinking changed. Trump’s potential Supreme Court picks, alone, could yield a lifetime of policy positions that run counter to her core beliefs, said the 42-year-old patent attorney and Democrat from Princeton, N.J.

She learned on social media about a Rutgers University program that teaches women how to run for public office and registered early for the March session, telling her friends “we should actually do something and run.”

“I thought, now’s the time to participate and not just vote, be an active voice,” she said.

Before the election, conventional wisdom said Hillary Clinton could inspire more women to run for office by becoming the first woman president. But if interest in campaign training is any indication, Clinton’s loss — and more specifically, Trump’s victory — may be having a similar effect.

Read more at USA Today

Will Women Still Want to Run?

Posted in In the News on November 18th, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

After the ugliest campaign in recent memory, would any woman in her right mind want to run for president again?

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: Some will be discouraged. Those who run will do so with the full knowledge that we do not live in a post-gender world, any more than we do in a post-racial one.

People will long debate how much being a woman factored into Hillary Clinton’s narrow loss. But to those who study gender and politics, certain issues were clear, and they will frame the campaigns of women who may run in the future.

It has been a political science truism that female candidates cannot win unless voters see them as qualified for office; men have more leeway.

“Donald Trump never held elective office,” said Debbie Walsh, the director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. “I don’t think there’s a woman who could get away with that.”

Political scientists saw a double bind: political experience, branded in this election as being part of a clueless or corrupt elite, worked against the woman running for office, while political inexperience helped the man. (Exit polls showed that 18 percent of those who voted for Mr. Trump did not think he was qualified to be president).

As a female candidate, “you have to prove your qualifications beyond the shadow of a doubt,” said Adrienne Kimmell, executive director of the Barbara Lee Family Foundation, which has been studying women’s political races for 20 years. “How are you supposed to prove your qualifications while still being an outsider? I don’t know what the answer is to that question.”

Scholars also noticed that while past polls suggested that voters had dropped their resistance to seeing a woman as commander in chief, exit polls suggested a more nuanced reality.

Read more at The New York Times

For Women, Glass Ceilings, and Glass Walls, Too

Posted in In the News on November 16th, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

NORTHAMPTON, Mass. — One week after the election, many students on my campus, one of the nation’s largest women’s colleges, remain heartbroken that Hillary Clinton was not able to shatter, in her words, “the highest, hardest glass ceiling.”

At Smith, every student leadership position from captain of the sports team to president of the student government is held by a woman, but my students know, even today, that this is a rare exception in a sexist world.

Still, there was a lot of hope and excitement on campus leading up to Election Day. This week, one student told me: “I’m still in shock. The reality is hitting me in waves.”

Many people have attributed Mrs. Clinton’s loss to her actions in public life, or to an America that wanted “change” at any cost. But this loss is as much about sexism as anything else.

Read more at The New York Times

Exit polls show split among female voters by race and party

Posted in In the News on November 14th, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

Hillary Clinton made history as the first woman to be nominated for President by one of the national major parties, but how much of an impression did she make with female voters? 

While CNN exit polls found 55 percent of Pennsylvania women voters cast their ballots for the former Secretary of State, 50 percent of white women ended up electing Donald Trump. 

“Women, overall, are more democratic but traditionally white women usually support the Republican candidate,” said Dr. Dana Brown, the executive director of the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics at Chatham University. “What was surprising was that he won with white women in such a huge margin [nationally] when he has a negative view of women.” 

Marlene Gunther, the chair of the Montour County Republican Committee, said she voted for Trump because she felt he could make the country better for her children.

“Because I think there’s good and bad in everybody,” she said. “I think we need to put that [the approximately 16 women who have accused Trump of sexual assault and his comments from the Billy Bush recording] aside and focus on policy.” 

Northumberland Republican Party Chair Beth Kremer said she believes Hillary Clinton tried too hard to make it all about women and Trump realized men and women care about the same issues, such as the economy. 

Dr. Michele DeMary, the political science department chair at Susquehanna University, said for many conservative, white women, “when the pocketbook issues matter, they matter.” 

Read more at The Daily Item

Sexism 2016: More Women In Politics, But Representation In Congress, State Legislatures Lags Behind Men

Posted in In the News on November 9th, 2016 by admin – Be the first to comment

Hillary Clinton, eight years after first running for president for the first time, still couldn’t break through the “highest glass ceiling” to become the first woman elected president in United States history. She was losing to Donald Trump Tuesday after a contentious election season that at times seemed to focus on sexism in a way that hadn’t been seen in modern politics.

Experts note there is still work to be done to reach a level of gender parity — an equal representation between men and women  in public office compared to the population, which is roughly 50-50. From mayors at the local level to state legislatures and the United States Congress, women are significantly outnumbered by men across the country but progress has been made.

“The U.S. has lagged behind many other countries and, right now, we’re at roughly 20 percent” women representation in politics, Sara Angevine, a visiting professor of political science at Whittier College in California, told the International Business Times. “That is not where we aim to be. We’re one of the few industrialized countries who have never had a female in the executive, so this is a big deal in setting the precedent.”

Read more at the International Business Times